Register, to enjoy an extra
15% welcome discount today

As a much-valued practitioner, we would like to take a moment to explain some of the key points of difference between what is often termed as “Evidence based Nutrition” vs “Electromagnetic Nutrition”

 

There is little doubt that the application of nutrition to optimise health is a controversial subject at best. Many researchers are divided as the results seem to be inconclusive and often potentially quite misleading.  Of course this might be more about the limitations of science to truly evaluate this subject, considering that the scientific community has recently revealed that 52% of scientific trials can’t be replicated by their peers. 

 

As naturopaths, we are taught that all individuals are different. For this reason, we should always strive to develop personalised regimes that are designed to revitalise our client’s individual needs in accordance with the needs of each client’s internal terrain or resonance (as stated by Antoine Béchamp). After all, aren’t we all taught from a young age that “One man’s medicine is another man’s poison?”

 

Therefore, if this is so, few scientific research results can be replicated, this approach is of diminished value in a clinical environment, raising the question: Isn’t it time to reconsider how we evaluate a client’s vitality or “electromagnetic conductivity?” 

 

After all, as Albert Einstein once stated, “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created it”.  He also said “Insanity Is Doing the Same Thing Over and Over Again and Expecting Different Results”. 

 

Over the coming weeks we would like to share some thought-provoking differences between these two nutritional approaches to evaluating a client’s vibrancy, to see which approach resonates best with you.

 

Light as an energy source

 

Many Orthodox nutritional approaches assume that food is our only source of energy, yet the yogi’s lifestyle, often going many weeks without food or water would suggests that we all have the potential to become truly enlightened (our ability to hold and convert light into energy). While very few of us would desire the life of a yogi, this example demonstrates that in the western world as the toxins build up at a cellular level, becoming more challenging in their nature, the cells start to change through the 16 levels of cellular change outlined by Heinrich Kremer, from healthy “aerobic” cells (80% oxygen – 20% glucose), that can capture and hold light effectively, to the other extreme of the spectrum “anaerobic” cells that are (80% glucose and 20% oxygen) and are far less effective at converting light into energy, to produce ATP, (as low as 1;16^th as effective) which is essential for healthy respiratory function.

 

Over the coming weeks we will review

 

Predispositions

 

Less is more

 

Herings Law of Cure

 

Beachamp vs Pasteur

 

Viewing the human body like a test tube

 

Dehydration

We’re delighted to announce lots of new additions to our amazing range of predominately additive and allergen-free food supplements. As always, they're crafted with both economy, excellence and purity in mind, and we think you’re going to be very impressed by their inspired formulation. However, we don’t just expect you to take our word for this, which is why we’re offering a special introductory Buy 2 pay for 1 offer whenever you purchase two or more units of the same product, from a product line you haven’t tried before!

In recent months, Brexit has been the topic on everyone’s tongues, and following in its wake, it has been easy to miss other developments, including a recent announcement by the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). The missive, which came on the back of a court judgement re glucosamine products

When reviewing our health options, as westerners it’s understandable that we would often do this from a western viewpoint, indeed when it comes to the controversial issue of how our dietary intake influences our health and wellbeing, its concerning to observe the inordinate amount of faith we place on what many describe as scientific research, yet few are aware that at least 50% of these so called scientific research papers are known to be at best highly speculative or even misleading, leaving many consumers confused or bewildered by these conflicting results.

Since the Brexit vote, there has been a significant devaluation in sterling. One way that practitioners like yourself will have felt this is through the attendant price increases, which are only set to continue as we move forward.

Electromagnetic Nutrition Introducing a different dimension to our nutritional understanding Electromagnetic nutrition is a term that has been coined to describe an approach to understanding the effects of food and supplementation on our bodies from an energetic view point. We all know that we are so much more than just physical matter, yet as naturopaths we often focus our energies on breaking down and understanding our bodies from a biochemical point of view, rather than observing the electromagnetic effects these substances exhibit within us. When pushed we even ask ourselves “What is every cell in your body telling us” perhaps 2018 will be the year we once again start to talk openly about the need to evaluate these important influences as deeply as we try to understand our unfathomable biochemical imbalances.

We’re so grateful to have the chance to communicate with you today, and want to take this opportunity to inform you all about the pending launch of our new Conella brand. The brainchild of Andrew Wren, it will challenge some of the views that are so prevalent within modern-day nutritional arenas, while adding some interesting new dimensions to help you enhance your current naturopathic offerings.

Treating scientific theory as fact may bring temporary comfort, but at what cost to our instinctive perception of ourselves.

These days many revel in the impressive steps towards so called “evidence based nutrition” or as some would refer to it “distorting the evidence to accomplish a desired outcome” It’s strange to me, but many naturopaths have long sought the recognition of orthodox medicine, however I have always warned that this really shouldn't be at any cost!

As the multi-nationals invest further into the alternative medicine profession, we ask the question; does this mark their acceptance of our core beliefs and principles or could it be a bid to change the very foundations of what we believe and bring us more in line with mainstream medicine?